MHonArc v2.4.5 -->
















ubl-ndrsc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Position paper for semantic containers




From: "Stuhec, Gunther" <gunther.stuhec@sap.com>
To: "'Tim McGrath'" <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:17:07 +0200 






Title: Message



Hello 
Tim,
 
that's 
correct. But we have seen that model groups (xsd:group) makes a problem to us. 
It is not possible to do an extension or a restriction of referred model groups. 
We think, this is k.o.-criteria. If we're interesting on this proposal, than we 
have to change the XML-schema structure or we have to send this new features as 
requirements to the XML schema working group.
 
Kind 
regards,
 
    Gunther
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim McGrath 
[mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Sent: Freitag, 4. April 2003 
02:01
To: Stuhec, Gunther
Cc: 
'ubl-ndrsc@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Position 
paper for semantic containers

it seems to me that this is 
'how to express mike's document assembly ideas in XSD'.  does the NDR group 
see this as well?

the title is misleading it should be "Expressing Object 
Classes (ACC and ABIEs) in XSD" - we should try and keep consistent 
terminology.

Stuhec, Gunther wrote:


  
  
Hello all, 
  
I attached my paper about the semantic containers 
  on to this mail. I send my paper to the group, because a couldn't find the new 
  e-mail address from Arofan. Arofan, could you have a look on my paper, 
  please.
  
Thank you. 
  
Kind regards, 
  
        Gunther 
  
<<draft-stuhec-semcontainers-01.doc>> 

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160