On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Dan Vint wrote:
>>Sorry this didn't get in the minutes/notes but it was disscussed on a call.
>>The Regex that was published was:
>>
>> [a-zA-Z]+[a-zA-Z0-9]*
>>
>>the problem is the first '+' it should not be there as all you want to
>>specify is the first character like this:
>>
>> [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*
>>
>>..dan
Thank you, Dan, and you're right about the extra "+".
This makes the regex more compact.
Can I presume that since this modification was supposed to
be minuted but didn't, that this latter regex is accepted
as Rule 5?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
http://SoftML.Net/