UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Containers

  • 1.  RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Containers

    Posted 05-15-2003 18:36
    Lisa:
    
    Give the outcome of the global-vs.-local debate, and the fact that we have
    more than one doctype per namespace, i suspect we will need to adopt a
    convention that, instead of using �Head�, uses �[doctype]Head� or similar.
    
    Cheers,
    
    Arofan
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Lisa-Aeon [mailto:lseaburg@aeon-llc.com]
    Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 9:35 AM
    To: UBL-NDR
    Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Containers
    
    
    Our discussions of containers in London brought forward the following
    proposal.  No one at the meeting disagreed on this point.  Do we need to
    continue the discussion, or pass to Mark for inclusion into the NDR Main
    document?
    
    Lisa
    
    Proposal:
    
     1.  All documents shall have a container for metadata  and which proceeds
    the body of the document and is named  "Head" _____________. (anything but
    header)
    
     2.  All elements with a cardinality of 1..n, (and lack a qualifing
    structure) must be contained by a list container named  "(name of repeating
    element)List", which has a cardinality of 1..1.
    
    
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Lisa Seaburg
    AEON Consulting
    Website: http://www.aeon-llc.com
    Email:  lseaburg@aeon-llc.com
    Alternative Email: xcblgeek@yahoo.com
    Phone: 662-562-7676
    Cellphone: 662-501-7676
    
    "If you obey all the rules, you miss all the fun."
                           -Katharine Hepburn
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    
    
    
    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.474 / Virus Database: 272 - Release Date: 4/18/2003