UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only
  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] AppInfo

    Posted 08-05-2003 18:59
    As far as I remember, the issue with AppInfo was consistency and
    interoperability of implementations.
    
    AFAIK nothing has changed in this front.
    
    However, if it is to be used for conveying non-normative
    information only, then I'm ok with its use. Otherwise not.
    
    
    Eve L. Maler wrote:
    > I don't know that it's a good idea to use AppInfo for important code 
    > list semantics/equivalents information, but I no longer see AppInfo as a 
    > particular threat in and of itself.  Either its contents are supported 
    > by an application-specific level of processing or they're not; it won't 
    > impact the normative schema model.  It could certainly be useful, for 
    > example, for some people to put Schematron renditions of checkable 
    > business rules in there.
    > 
    >     Eve
    > 
    > CRAWFORD, Mark wrote:
    > 
    >> Folks,
    >>  
    >> Our current NDR language has xsd:AppInfo as not allowed. This came 
    >> from our initial risk assessment in which we declared XSD:AppInfo as 
    >> having an unacceptable risk factor.  Last week in Montreal Ken Holman 
    >> seconded a proposal from the UK that we modify our position and allow 
    >> for the use of xsd:AppInfo for conveying 1) code list value names and 
    >> 2) formatting instructions.  Jon is also in favor of using xsd:AppInfo 
    >> as he sees this as the logical place for the information - including 
    >> the code list value names we currently specify to be carried in 
    >> xsd:Documentation. We also have one of our earlier decisions that said 
    >> that formatting was not something we saw as normative UBL.   
    >> The pros and cons of handling the formatting issue will be discussed 
    >> on the LCSC listserve - and frankly as long as they are talking about 
    >> a non-normative associated schema I don't really care how they handle 
    >> it.  However I am still very much against the use of XSD:AppInfo.  So 
    >> that we may provide guidance to the ad-hoc code list group in LC, I 
    >> would like to get a sense of others - especially Eve, Eduardo, Matt, 
    >> Arofan, and Bill regarding what if anything NDR should do regarding 
    >> our current restriction on the use of XSD:AppInfo.
    >>  
    >>
    >> */Mark/*//
    >>
    > 
    
    -- 
    Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
    Web Technologies and Standards |         Phone:  +1 510 550 4616 x31442
    Sun Microsystems Inc.          |
    W3C AC Rep / OASIS TAB Chair