At Monday, 12 November 2001, Doug Bunting <dougb62@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Mike,
>
>I believe the action item I took was to test msXML with respect
to its XML
>Schema conformance. I haven't started on that but my tardiness
is unrelated
>to the issue you raise.
>
>It's important that we make a rational choice when placing this
parser on
>our priority list, deciding how much weight we want to give its
feature set
>in our guidelines. Am I correct in thinking you'd like msXML to be
>relatively high in the list?
Thanks for clarifying the action item. Yes, I think msXML needs
to be relatively high on the list.
-------------------------------------
Mike Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
=end of email===