UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

Re: [ubl-ndrsc] MSXML and Parser List

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] MSXML and Parser List

    Posted 11-12-2001 12:53
    At Monday, 12 November 2001, Doug Bunting <dougb62@yahoo.com> wrote:
    
    >Mike,
    >
    >I believe the action item I took was to test msXML with respect 
    to its XML
    >Schema conformance.  I haven't started on that but my tardiness 
    is unrelated
    >to the issue you raise.
    >
    >It's important that we make a rational choice when placing this 
    parser on
    >our priority list, deciding how much weight we want to give its 
    feature set
    >in our guidelines.  Am I correct in thinking you'd like msXML to be
    >relatively high in the list?
    
    Thanks for clarifying the action item.  Yes, I think msXML needs 
    to be relatively high on the list.
    
    -------------------------------------
    Mike Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
    www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
    
    
    
    
    =end of email===