MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl-ndrsc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] UBL: question on CCT language component
Tim McGrath wrote:
> I cannot find where it says they are indicator. Content??? di you
> mean Identifier. Content?
>
> In the data model i derived fro the tables in 8-1 and 8-2, you will
> see that both Language.Identifier and Language.Locale.Identifier are
> Identifiers and therefore have an Identifer. Content (ie xsd:token).
But I see that lots of things are identifiers: currency identifier,
binary object uri, code list agency identifier, etc. They are not all
components of the Identifier CCT. Each of the 10 CCTs listed in table
8-1 have components of many types (I see text, code, and identifier type
components for each CCT). Yet the last entry in table 8-1 clearly shows
language.identifier and language.locale.identifier as belonging to the
CCT with a D.E.N. of Text.Type.
Couldn't agree more with your following statement. Especially table 8-2
which flattens 8-1 in a very obfuscating manner.
> This conundrum exposes the 'flat' structures we have built for CCTs
> and Rep. Terms , when they should have been more sophisticated. That
> is, we should have had things like...
>
> <Language>
> <Identifier>
> <Content>
> EN
> </Content>
> </Identifier>
> <LocaleIdentifier>
> <Content>
> US
> </Content>
> </LocaleIdentifier>
> </Language>
>
> where the schema reflects the true structures of the CCTs and not the
> table
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]