UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Containers

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Containers

    Posted 05-16-2003 13:33
    On Fri, 16 May 2003, Eduardo Gutentag wrote:
    
    >>Whatever the case is wrt the doctypes, you would still have only
    >>one root (duh!) so you would also have only one Head; 
    
    Yep, I tend to agree becoz one the advantages of <Head> is that
    there's only 1 head across all the types, so that processing-
    oriented (as opposed to type-oriented) computations can be
    performed with a "well-known element".
    
    Specific purpose-intended metadata could be sloted within the
    <Head> itself, so we *could* have something like:
    
        <Head>
           <DocInfo>
              <UBLVersion>...</UBLVersion>
              <DocType>...</DocType>
              <DocID>...</DocID>
              <CreationSoftware>...</CreationSoftware>
              <CreationDateTime>...</CreationDateTime>
              ...
           </DocInfo>
           <...
        </Head>
    
    (Ok, please don't scream, this is just an example!)
    
    
    
    Best Regards,
    Chin Chee-Kai
    SoftML
    Tel: +65-6820-2979
    Fax: +65-6743-7875
    Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
    http://SoftML.Net/