UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only
Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: [ubl-lcsc] CCT, RT, DT Files with fixed Major:Minor numbering

  • 1.  RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: [ubl-lcsc] CCT, RT, DT Files with fixed Major:Minor numbering

    Posted 10-10-2003 12:16 
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















    ubl-ndrsc message
    







    [Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]
    


    







    Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: [ubl-lcsc] CCT, RT, DT Files with fixed Major:Minor numbering
    







    



    Title: Message
    




    Hello 
Tim,
    

     
    

    I'm 
answering your other questions, now:
    

    


    a. Does this code set implementation conform to that used for other 
code sets in the Library?  for example, these should be 'standard' code 
sets using the mechanisms of our code catalogue.   
    

     
    

    <GS>This is not agreed with the NDRSC, now. And the file name is a 
part of the NDRSC</GS> 
    


    b. Where we re-use these codes in the Library BIEs, do they/can they 
share a common source?  for example, will your 'currencyID' reference our 
'UBL-CodeList-CurrencyCode-Use-1.0-???????.xsd'? 
    

     
    

    <GS>This is not agreed with the NDRSC, now. And the file name is a 
part of the NDRSC</GS> 
    



    Of course, none of this is an NDR issue - although we did spend 
time talking about this on the Joint NDR/LC call 3 weeks ago and no-one at NDR 
mentioned you were planning to do this.   
    

     
    

    <GS>I guess, this is a NDRSC 
issue</GS> 

    Bear in mind, the code working group 
and LC have spent several weeks working on a code set implementation mechanism 
and don't want to inherit any orphans at this late stage. 
    

     
    

    <GS>I do not know the latest decisions of the code working group. 
Does this decisions impacts the xml schema? I mean the xml schema 
definitions and declarations and not the part within 
annotation.</GS> 

    Also, we shall be building the 
final 1.0 schemas following the Friday teleconference.  We need to receive 
the final CCT, RT and DT schemas before then if we are to use them for UBL 
1.0 
    

     
    

    <GS>I hope the sent version is stable, 
now!!!</GS>
    

     
    

    Kind 
regards,
    

     
    

        Gunther 
    





    







    


    [Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]


Related Content