UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Fw: [ubl-lcsc] ccts Annotation Structure (fwd)

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Fw: [ubl-lcsc] ccts Annotation Structure (fwd)

    Posted 07-02-2003 21:19
    ** Reply to message from "Burcham, Bill" <Bill_Burcham@stercomm.com> on Wed, 2
    Jul 2003 16:02:30 -0500
    
    > I agree with Chee-Kai on this one, it is wrong to have A and A' schemas. I
    > cannot represent Eduardo's viewpoint effectively, so I won't try.
    
    I'm not exactly sure what you mean by A and A' Schemas, but I assume you are
    referring to the earlier discussion on whether it was appropriate to have two
    versions of the same Schema - one with annotations and one without - and apply
    the same namespace URI to both.  My personal answer would be 'yes' - as long as
    both Schemas validate the same documents in the same way, I think it is
    perfectly reasonable to provide full fat and low fat versions.  Although people
    could process the full fat version themselves to remove the annotations, my
    experience is that the majority would feel happier using an "approved" low fat
    Schema.
    
    	Cheers,
    		Tony.
    ====
    Anthony B. Coates
    London Market Systems Limited
    33 Throgmorton Street, London, EC2N 2BR 
    http://www.londonmarketsystems.com/
    mailto:abcoates@londonmarketsystems.com
    Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026
    [MDDL Editor (Market Data Definition Language), http://www.mddl.org/]
    [FpML Arch WG Member (Financial Products Markup Language), http://www.fpml.org/]
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    This Email may contain confidential information and/or copyright material and is intended for the use of the addressee only.
    Any unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you receive this Email by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply  facility in your e-mail software.
    Email is not a secure method of communication and London Market Systems Limited cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message or any attachment(s). Please examine this email for virus infection, for which London Market Systems Limited accepts no responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of London Market Systems Limited.