UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Fw: [ubl-lcsc] ccts Annotation Structure (fwd)

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Fw: [ubl-lcsc] ccts Annotation Structure (fwd)

    Posted 06-28-2003 00:21
    
    
    Lisa-Aeon wrote:
    
    >I am forwarding this from the FPSC and LCSC since this has to do with the
    >embedded documentation in the schema.  The only rule we have in the
    >checklist is R96, which states:
    >
    >"Two schemas shall be developed for each standard.  One schema shall be a
    >run-time schema devoid of documentation. One schema shall be a fully
    >annotated schema that employs XHTML for the annotations."
    >
    >There is not description of how it is to be used and can be intrepreted in
    >many different ways.  Shall we join this discussion?
    >
    >I know that we voted on using xsd:documentation and not xsd:appinfo, for
    >embedded documentation, I think there should be a rule saying this.
    >
    Agreed. But has this decision made it yet to the NDR document? If it 
    has, it is
    surprising that there is no rule associated with it...
    
    >
    >Lisa
    >
    >
    >