To get this on the record, I agree with Eve. I would like to ask Gunther
why he had proposed "prohibited" at the use attribute value, just in case
there is something there. Other wise, lets discuss on next call, decide and
move forward.
Lisa
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>
To: "Lisa Seaburg" <lseaburg@aeon-llc.com>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Supplementary Components in UBL
> Oh yes, I agree. I just meant that if there wasn't time to do an
> exhaustive case-by-case review, a summary decision to make all supp
> complments not otherwise considered into optional attributes...
>
> Eve
>
> Lisa Seaburg wrote:
> > I guess I thought it was going to the list.
> >
> > I guess my only question is, shouldn't we at least decide, put it in the
> > records, and move on. This comes out of the comments on 0p70, a
decision
> > would at least give us something to say back on the question.
> >
> > Lisa
> --
> Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
> Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441
> Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
>
>