Hello Bill, that would be OK. A thought, I'm using always the UBL-Names for XSD complex type names. I guess, there is still a bug in may program. But I will solve this as soon as possible. A have seen some another bugs in my programm, too. The cardinalities are not correct and not all definitions are existing. But I'm fixing this bugs now and hope, I can send out the corrected XML-schemes, today. Kind regards, Gunther