MHonArc v2.4.5 -->

















ubl-ndrsc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Naming conventions of business documents?




From: Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
To: "Stuhec, Gunther" <gunther.stuhec@sap.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 02:08:44 +0800






Title: 




i am not sure we need to re-invent this convention.  for a start, we already
have the OAG group using <VERB><NOUN><REVISION> and the
ebXML MS has <SERVICE><ACTION> for adding behavior to document
names.  I also thought the ebXML BPSS went into more detail than just <DOCUMENTNAME>
- but i am not up to date with the later versions, so perhaps someone else
has more info. on that


personally, i cannot see why the CC/ISO11179 conventions don't work for documents
as well as ABIEs. A document is really an ABIE that has some special role
in a collaborative business process.


Object Class  Qualifier =  Transfer, Original,
Replacement, Update, Delete, Change, Cancel, Delivery

Object Class = Order, Invoice, Schedule

Property Qualifier = Notification, Query, Response,
Collaboration, Negotiation, Request, Confirmation

Property =  Document

Representation Term =  Document


we already have placeholders for this in our current models if we decide
to populate them.


Stuhec, Gunther wrote:

   
  
 
  
  
    
  
Hello all, 
  
  
I have a question to the naming conventions
of the name of business documents´. 
  
  
Every name of business documents exists
of three parts: 
  
  
        - Object: PurchaseOrder, Invoice,
DeliverySchedule, etc.

        - Method: Transfer, Create, Update, Delete

        - Activity: Notification, Query, Response,
Collaboration, Negotiation, Request, Confirmation 
  
  
How can we assembly this three parts in
names business documents? Like: "Create. Delivery. Notification"

  Is the name of the generic header the same
as the name of the business document?

  Do some rules existing now? Do we assembling
like that: Method. Object. Acitivity?

  Should we use for the activity verbs or nouns?

  Are the terms "Object", "Method" and "Ativity"
enough or too much?

  Do you have another suggestions? 
  
  
It would be very glad, if you can help me.

  Thank you very much. 
  
  
Kind regards, 
  
  
        Gunther 
  


-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142 











References:

[ubl-ndrsc] Naming conventions of business documents?
From: "Stuhec, Gunther" <gunther.stuhec@sap.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]