Burcham, Bill wrote:
> Would such a rule not conflict with the NDRSC rule that namespaces be
> immutable over time? The rule below means to me that I can't count on a
> particular namespace name reliably identifying a particular schema.
Ok, I hate doing this, but I must ask you to identify and make a clear
reference to "the rule below", perhaps even a quotation, because I can
see no rule below that indicates that namespaces may not be immutable
over time. I'm confused.
>
> If we want to have optional documentation, then I think we should define it
> externally from the get go. Anything that sits in the schemas as
> annotations is there for good. Right?
>
>