EM Infrastructure Framework SC

 View Only

RE: [emergency] infrastructure white patper (from Gary)

  • 1.  RE: [emergency] infrastructure white patper (from Gary)

    Posted 10-07-2003 22:36
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency-if message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [emergency] infrastructure white patper (from Gary)


    Gary's comments....
    
    -----Forwarded Message-----
    > c) DMI-S TIE: I, personally, like the inclusion of this, but my concern
    > is that it is currently a non-public de facto standard. While one
    > approach would be to recommend we do not list these kinds of standards
    > in our efforts, I think a better approach might be to see if Gary, et al
    > might considering submitting TIE to the TC, so that we can start working
    > to standardize on it? Gary?
     
    Gary's response:
     
    Regarding the DMIS TIE data structure:
     
    DMIS has a defined internal data structure that I have translated to XML
    Schema. It would need work to put it into standard a standard quality effort
    and I have not done so because of what are best described as 'political
    implications." Specifically, DMIS came to this committee with no intention
    of being prescriptive with regard to the specifics of any data structure.
    We felt that it was our job to use and interoperate on the basis industry
    defined standards. Our primary goal is to provide infrastructure, not define
    internal content. We were, and remain, concerned that trying to impose our
    own structures on industry might be misconstrued as a Government program
    trying to limit industry competition, which is exactly the OPPOSITE of the
    intention of the DMIS program. That said, IF the committee specifically
    asks, AS A COMMITTEE, for that XML, I will be happy to provide it. I will
    need a your help in bringing it to industrial strength.  And DMIS would, of
    course, be amenable to committee adjustments in structure.  I suspect that
    we might need to align it a bit with DOJ terminology as well. There would be
    a lot of work to do.  On the other hand the basic information is based on
    three years of requirements development effort.
     
    Respectfully,
    
    Gary A. Ham
    
    -- 
    R. Allen Wyke
    Chair, Emergency Management TC
    emtc@nc.rr.com
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emergency
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]