EM Messages and Notification SC

 View Only

Re: [emergency-msg] ICS 201 Object Model

  • 1.  Re: [emergency-msg] ICS 201 Object Model

    Posted 08-14-2003 07:10
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency-msg message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] ICS 201 Object Model


    David, looks good - you guys DEFINITELY have a great start off on this
    effort. Couple of comments, that probably need nothing more than
    clarification.
    
    1. In the object model I can see where things, such as the Area
    Description is required for an area, but is an area required for
    incidentInfo? Same for incidentInfo to ics201 (I definitely assume that
    is required), resourcesSummary to incidentInfo, organization to
    incidentInfo, and mapSketch to area.
    
    2. Something that would be beneficial in the first page of the example
    document, which would also resolve my questions for #1, is to mark what
    is option, required, and repeatable. Just a thought.
    
    3. In the Summary (7) section of the form, I feel the crystal ball is
    speaking. I can foresee the desire, or maybe even need, in the future to
    embed/reference other XML dialects (potentially external to the document
    itself - think about, but avoid the color conversation we had about
    attachments in CAP at the mini-F2F :) in order to more accurately define
    what is happening. Whether it is temperature or maybe the description of
    a resource that was deployed. Having said that, I think it is probably
    premature to allow it, BUT we should put some thought into not
    preventing it in the future.
    
    4. In the Current Organization (6) section of the form, the crystal ball
    is speaking again. Not of future needs, but of innovative opportunity.
    This is one of those times that having a Microsoft representative on the
    TC would be helpful. Imagine, and I am completely making this up by the
    way, the part of Microsoft's future solutions for Public Safety involve
    an application that allows responders to quickly map out a process for
    responding to an emergency. This could involve anything from an org
    (Visio) chart of people/agencies involved, conveniently linked to a task
    tracking application (MS Project), to mapping out the work flow and/or
    business processes that have been put in place to ensure guidelines are
    adhered to and followed (think BizTalk's Orchestration Designer - aka
    Visio for building/linking/creating Business Process). Now imagine
    exporting this information into a format that can be included in the ICS
    201 form not unlike embedding a spreadsheet or video in a PowerPoint
    presentation. Anyway, my point is that from a software innovation
    perspective this section has a lot of opportunity, so we should think
    about that.
    
    5. And finally the Resource Summary (5) page - basically a combo of the
    Current Organization page and the Summary page. Need + Innovation = we
    should think about it.
    
    I know a lot of this may sound pie in the sky, but from a software
    vendor's perspective in this space, have #3 - #5 become a reality is not
    as complex as you might think. Additionally, and this is really the
    important reason, having our ICS work empowered to dramatically improve
    the current paper solution makes for a compelling business case to
    adopt. Our ability to turn this part of an ICS form into a living,
    breathing, document that extremely more powerful, because of its
    actionability, than its paper ancestor can really get things moving
    fast.
    
    Again, I certainly am not implying we have or should do all of this.
    Just that we should consider it, because it may put a longer term
    perspective in our minds as we move forward.
    
    Allen
    
    On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 11:28, David Hall wrote:
    > Please find attached a first cut at the object model diagram for ICS
    > Form 201 - Incident Briefing.
    >  
    > I have also included an example of a filled out Form 201. Note that I
    > could not find a completed example of the Map portion.
    >  
    > Assume this is too late to discuss today, but if I could get
    > feedback/questions before next weeks mtg, that would be appreciated.
    >  
    > Thanks,
    >  
    > David
    >  
    > ******************************
    > David Hall
    > Federal Support Systems
    > 703-627-0215
    > 703-832-5664 fax
    > -----------------------------
    > System Engineering
    > Information Security
    > Internet Software Systems
    > Project Management
    > ******************************
    >  
    > 
    > ______________________________________________________________________
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: emergency-msg-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
    > For additional commands, e-mail: emergency-msg-help@lists.oasis-open.org
    -- 
    R. Allen Wyke
    Chair, Emergency Management TC
    emtc@nc.rr.com
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emergency
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]