OASIS LegalXML Member Section

 View Only

RE: [legalxml-ms] Elections for at-large representatives

  • 1.  RE: [legalxml-ms] Elections for at-large representatives

    Posted 12-22-2006 20:41
    Agree
    
     
    Regards, 
    Don 
    Donald L. Bergeron 
    Systems Designer 
    LexisNexis 
    donald.bergeron@lexisnexis.com 
    O 937-865-1276 
    H 937-748-2775 
    M 937-672-7781 
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: John M. Greacen [mailto:john@greacen.net] 
    Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 1:12 PM
    To: 'John Messing'; legalxml-ms@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: RE: [legalxml-ms] Elections for at-large representatives
    
    No objection from this quarter.
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: John Messing [mailto:jmessing@law-on-line.com]
    > Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 9:37 AM
    > To: legalxml-ms@lists.oasis-open.org
    > Subject: [legalxml-ms] Elections for at-large representatives
    > 
    > Dear All:
    > 
    > By my reckoning, our next meeting of the SC should take place on January
    > 10, 2007. The holidays are upon us, which is a bad time to ask people to
    > vote on anything.
    > 
    > Subject to timely objection, I propose we open the nominations now, hold
    > them open to the close of business on Dec. 29th, after which they will
    > be closed once and for all, and vote commencing on January 3, closing
    > on the evening of the 8th, thus giving any new members at least two
    > days before the Januuary SC meeting.
    > 
    > I think it will be suitable to leave the current nominees on the list of
    > nominated candidates. Each can withdraw if he likes, but it will save
    > work for those who are already on the ticket and intend to remain on
    > it. Any communication nominating or self-nominating an additional
    > candidate should be copied to the SC list. All further communications
    > between either the Chair or Secretary in their respective roles and any
    > nominee should also be posted to the list. This will ensure transparency
    > of the nomination process.
    > 
    > I plan to explain to the Member Section that we are initiating a new
    > voting method that was worked out this year with OASIS. We encountered
    > a few rough spots in this first implementation, including discovery that
    > the list of eligible voters obtained from OASIS staff was
    > incomplete and would have excluded approximately a quarter of our
    > electorate from voting had the election gone forward as planned. We are
    > informally preparing guidelines so the experience should not be repeated
    > in future years.
    > 
    > These difficulties have highlighted a need for me to devote my energies
    > to working closely as Chair with the Secretary in the conduct and
    > administration of the new elections. I will therefore be withdrawing as
    > a candidate for an at-large post and will remain as the eNotary TC
    > representative until the next TC election for that post and as the Chair
    > for the current term. This will avoid any inconsistency or appearance of
    > impropriety from jointly administering the election while remaining a
    > candidate.
    > 
    > Your thoughts are sincerely requested and welcomed, but please be aware
    > that it will be desirable to have the nominations re-opened by the
    > close of business (5 PM EST, 2 PM PST) today if possible, and I intend
    > to request Roger to do so unless there is urgent business with regard
    > to this proposal still pending at that time.
    > 
    > Thank you.
    > 
    > John Messing
    > Chair, LegalXML Member Section