MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
docbook-tc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: DocBook RFE #824633
This RFE is pointing out that the content model
for firstterm is more restricted than the content
model for glossterm. Since firstterm is
the first occurance of a glossterm, I don't see why
this distinction exists.
Norm, can you put this on the agenda for our next meeting?
Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street
Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796
The SCO Group fax: (831) 429-1887
email: bobs@sco.com
----- Forwarded message from "SourceForge.net"
<noreply@sourceforge.net> -----
To: noreply@sourceforge.net
From: "SourceForge.net" <noreply@sourceforge.net>
Subject: [ docbook-DocBook RFEs-824633 ] classname should be allowed in
firstterm
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:49:57 -0700
DocBook RFEs item #824633, was opened at 2003-10-16 07:49
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384107&aid=824633&group_id=21935
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joachim Ziegler (quadruplex)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: classname should be allowed in firstterm
Initial Comment:
I'm just wondering why I cannot nest a <classname>
inside <firstterm>
whereas I can use it inside a <glossterm>. (?)
A firstterm is the first occurrence of a particular
glossterm, so the set of possible children should be
the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384107&aid=824633&group_id=21935
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
bobs@sagehill.net
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]