At 8 Mar 2000 13:22 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > <!-- The DocBook TC may produce an official MathML module for DocBook. --> > <!-- This PE provides the hook by which it can be inserted into the DTD. --> > <!ENTITY % mathml.hook > > <!ENTITY % equation.content (alt?, (graphic+ mediaobject+)) %mathml.hook; > > > ... > > <!ENTITY % equation.element INCLUDE > > <![%equation.element;[ > <!ELEMENT equation ((%formalobject.title.content;)?, (informalequation > %equation.content;))> > <!--end of equation.element-->]]> %mathml.hook; appears out of place to me. I can see that defining %mathml.hook; as mathml would make a valid content model, but it seems odd that the is part the model group in the <equation> definition, not part of a model group contained in %equation.content;, which is where %mathml.hook; is referenced. What about: <!ENTITY % equation.content (alt?, (graphic+ mediaobject+%mathml.hook;)) > Will %mathml.hook; be also added to <informalequation> and <inlineequation>? Regards, Tony Graham ====================================================================== Tony Graham mailto:
tgraham@mulberrytech.com Mulberry Technologies, Inc.
http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9632 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================