OASIS DocBook TC2

 View Only

Citation proposal RFE #810932

  • 1.  Citation proposal RFE #810932

    Posted 01-21-2004 21:59
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    docbook-tc message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Citation proposal RFE #810932


    Forwarding a reply that didnt't make it to the TC list.
    
      Date:         Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:32:23 -0500
      Reply-To:     Development of an XML core vocabulary for bibliographic
                    references <BIBLIOFILE@LISTS.UCC.IE>
      Sender:       Development of an XML core vocabulary for bibliographic
                    references <BIBLIOFILE@LISTS.UCC.IE>
      From:         Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@FASTMAIL.FM>
      Subject:      Re: [docbook-tc] info on citation item
      Comments: cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
      In-Reply-To:  <16352.56166.228337.186784@tipi.mininet>
      Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    
    Guess the meeting was cancelled, but on this Norm:
    
    > > Add <biblioref> to the content model of <quote>, <blockquote> and >
    > > <epigraph> > > > > Example: > > > > <quote>A quote <biblioref
    > > linkend="Smith1999"><bibliospec > > unit="page" start="22" stop="23
    > > /></biblioref></quote> > > Bibliospec has crept back in, didn't you
    > > remove that? > > We already have "attribution" for blockquote and
    > > epigraph. I don't > think > we need anything specific for quote. You
    > > can simply put the citation in > as you normally would, I think. > >
    > > <quote>A quote</quote><biblioref linkend="Smith1999" unit="page" >
    > > start="22" stop="23 /> > > True, the quote and the citation don't
    > > have a wrapper, but is that > really a problem? They're presumably
    > > in the same para.
    
    My strong opinion is it ought to be wrapped, and it ought be coded like
    so:
    
    <quote>A quote <citation><biblioref linkend="Smith1999" unit="page"
    start="22" stop="23 /></citation></quote>
    
    That a biblioref element happens to be in the same para element as a
    quote doesn't help if there is more than one quote.
    
    Markus and I have had a debate about whether biblioref needs to be
    wrapped in a citation element if it is itself wrapped in a quote or
    blockquote. My argument is that -- mostly for consistency's sake -- it
    should be.
    
    Now, if you want to get really extreme (and I do sometimes in the stuff
    I write), try to imagine how to elegantly code the following...
    
    "The world," said the clueless philosopher, "is flat" (Doe, 1953, p33;
    emphasis added).
    
    I can't figure out a way really to preserve the correct semantic meaning
    (that there is only one quote here) without jumping through hoops, and
    so I'd probably end up with this to be practical:
    
    <para><quote>The World,</quote> said the clueless philosopher, <quote>is
    <emphasis role="added">flat</emphasis><citation><biblioref
    linkend="doe1953" unit="page" start="33"/></citation></para>
    
    Bruce
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]