I was thinking of 'example' as denoting an example of English with equivalent Braille, which is what every occurrence of Braille appears as part of, from my reading. I didn't see any Braille that wasn't a part of such an example.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Dave Pawson
<dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7 December 2010 11:17, Nancy Harrison <
nancylph@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> For the braille parts themselves, the phrase markup as you mention it seems
> like a good idea.
>
> For the surrounding text, I'd recommend enclosing each combination of
> standard English/Braille transcription within an InformalExample element. I
> didn't see any completely inline usage of Braille, so that should work.
The wrappers are less of an issue, I wanted to find a way
of marking 'font' changes from text to simbraille | Ux2800 range,
which ever they choose.
> Otherwise, I found it a bit confusing to distinguish them in the Word
> document (even though I read some Braille). Then you could use whatever
> enclosing tagging you need (e.g. para, InformalTable, SegmentedList,
> SimpleList, etc.) within the InformalExample to contain the Braille phrases
Too true!
The 'markup' in the word document is .... as it occurs I think.
The styling has been picked up by one editor from the previous
one.
No real consistency.
Thanks Nancy.
--
--
_____________
Nancy Harrison
Infobridge Solutions
nharrison@infobridge-solutions.com