Norman Walsh <
ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > Proposed: Resolve RFE 440667 (Affiliation lacks CorpName) per the > published proposal[1]. Please respond YEA or NAY to >
docbook-tc@lists.oasis-open.org before Tuesday, 26 Feb 2002 at 05:00p > EST (02:00p PST, 22:00GMT, 23:00BST, 00:00CEST+, 07:00JST+). > > Be seeing you, > norm > > [1]
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9351&group_id=21935 I vote YEA for removing corpname. But I have a some questions about the additional attributes: classname (corporation nonprofit informal other) #IMPLIED otherclass CDATA #IMPLIED 1. Why classname and not just class ? 2. What's otherclass for? 3. Would it be worthwhile to add consortium to the enumerated list of values for classname? (for marking up consortium names like OASIS and W3C/World Wide Web Consortium) --Mike