OASIS DocBook TC2

 View Only
  • 1.  It looks like DocBook V4.5 will pass!

    Posted 09-29-2006 19:52
    Mary has to make the final announcement, of course, and I suppose that
    53 or more companies could suddenly vote "no", but it seems likely
    that with 52 members voting yes (15% of the membership) and no members
    voting no as of 15:51 EDT, our ballot for DocBook V4.5 will pass.
    
    :-)
    
                                            Be seeing you,
                                              norm
    
    -- 
    Norman Walsh 


  • 2.  Re: [docbook-tc] It looks like DocBook V4.5 will pass!

    Posted 09-29-2006 19:56
    Woohoo! Now we can get working on 5.0 as a Release Candidate! :-)
    
    --Scott
    
    Norman Walsh wrote:
    > Mary has to make the final announcement, of course, and I suppose that
    > 53 or more companies could suddenly vote "no", but it seems likely
    > that with 52 members voting yes (15% of the membership) and no members
    > voting no as of 15:51 EDT, our ballot for DocBook V4.5 will pass.
    >
    > :-)
    >
    >                                         Be seeing you,
    >                                           norm
    >
    >   
    
    
    -- 
    
    
    


  • 3.  RE: [docbook-tc] It looks like DocBook V4.5 will pass!

    Posted 09-29-2006 20:33
    Hi everyone,
    
      Please note that Kavi calculation is not accurate -- 15% of 357 is 52.05,
    meaning that you need 53 votes ... I did mention on the TAB call earlier today
    that two ballots were in jeopardy of failing due to insufficent votes and urged
    any voting members to vote ...
    
    Mary 
    
    > 


  • 4.  RE: [docbook-tc] It looks like DocBook V4.5 will pass!

    Posted 09-29-2006 21:44
    Mary,
    
    I see that JoAnn Hackos has voted for DocBook 4.5
    in the name of ComTech.
    
    But JoAnn Hackos is also listed as the voting 
    principle for Society for Technical Communication
    which is listed as not voting.
    
    I submit that OASIS makes this too confusing, and
    that if JoAnn voted for it for ComTech, she certainly
    meant to vote for it for STC, so we should also count
    STC as voting in favor of this ballot.
    
    JoAnn, if you read this email before midnight Saturday
    and can figure out how to cast a vote for STC, please
    do so.
    
    paul
    
    > 


  • 5.  Re: [docbook-tc] It looks like DocBook V4.5 will pass!

    Posted 09-30-2006 15:52
    Mary McRae wrote:
    
    >   Please note that Kavi calculation is not accurate -- 15% of 357 is 52.05,
    > meaning that you need 53 votes ... 
    
    This is not very good joke. I checked ballot page yesterday evening 
    (CEST) to see if we have enough votes. I saw 15% percent here, so I 
    didn't urged several members that are from US, who were at that time at 
    their work and can make additional votes before they will leave their 
    computers and go to weekend (when voting ends).
    
    It is absolutely unacceptable for me if 15% shown on OASIS page doesn't 
    mean 15% in reality. If this confusing information will led to fact that 
    DocBook V4.5 will not be approved as an OASIS standard I will have no 
    other possibility then to leave OASIS. Members of TC did a lot of hard 
    work to prepare DocBook V4.5 and I can't support organization that is 
    wasting time and talent of those people because of rounding error.
    
    Regards,
    
    			Jirka Kosek
    
    
    -- 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
       Jirka Kosek     e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz     http://www.kosek.cz
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
       Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
          Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
            Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
                        Nejbližší termíny školení:
         ** XSLT 23.-26.10.2006 ** XML schémata 13.-15.11.2006 **
          ** DocBook 11.-13.12.2006 ** XSL-FO 11.-12.12.2006 **
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
       http://xmlguru.cz    Blog mostly about XML for English readers
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    


  • 6.  Re: [docbook-tc] It looks like DocBook V4.5 will pass!

    Posted 10-01-2006 07:59
    Mary,
    
    I agree with Jirka and Norm on this 100%.  If the vote
    didn't actually make it in time because of this (I'm out
    of the country and don't have very good access, so I can't
    tell if we got that last vote or not), I think you have no
    option except to extend the voting period and send out a
    note explaining the situation.
    
    BTW, any possibility of giving an individual member .05 of
    a vote:-).  I think I pay at least that percentage of the
    smaller corporate types for my membership.  If so, count
    me as a yes!
    
    Thanks,
    Dick Hamilton
    rlhamilton@frii.com
    =================================
    On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 17:51 +0200, Jirka Kosek wrote:
    > Mary McRae wrote:
    > 
    > >   Please note that Kavi calculation is not accurate -- 15% of 357 is 52.05,
    > > meaning that you need 53 votes ... 
    > 
    > This is not very good joke. I checked ballot page yesterday evening 
    > (CEST) to see if we have enough votes. I saw 15% percent here, so I 
    > didn't urged several members that are from US, who were at that time at 
    > their work and can make additional votes before they will leave their 
    > computers and go to weekend (when voting ends).
    > 
    > It is absolutely unacceptable for me if 15% shown on OASIS page doesn't 
    > mean 15% in reality. If this confusing information will led to fact that 
    > DocBook V4.5 will not be approved as an OASIS standard I will have no 
    > other possibility then to leave OASIS. Members of TC did a lot of hard 
    > work to prepare DocBook V4.5 and I can't support organization that is 
    > wasting time and talent of those people because of rounding error.
    > 
    > Regards,
    > 
    > 			Jirka Kosek
    > 
    >