OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC

 View Only

RE: Use of MIME multipart for zero payload containers

  • 1.  RE: Use of MIME multipart for zero payload containers

    Posted 09-20-2001 12:23
    There has always been that concern in my mind that if it is not always
    MIME, then your endpoint code may have to sniff the message to determine if
    it is pure SOAP or a MIME.    no?
    
    Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer
    XML Industry Enablement
    IBM e-business Standards Strategy
    512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
    srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074
    
    
    
    "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com> on 09/20/2001 09:04:59 AM
    
    To:   "'Dan Weinreb'" <dlw@exceloncorp.com>, dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com
    cc:   rsalz@zolera.com, "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>,
          chris.ferris@sun.com, david@drummondgroup.com,
          ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject:  RE: Use of MIME multipart for zero payload containers
    
    
    
    Can we have a firm proposal from one of our "SOAP experts" on what we
    should
    do to fix this issue as there seem to be several alternatives ...
    
    Regards
    
    David
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Dan Weinreb [mailto:dlw@exceloncorp.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:10 PM
    To: dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com
    Cc: rsalz@zolera.com; david.burdett@commerceone.com;
    chris.ferris@sun.com; david@drummondgroup.com;
    ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: Re: Use of MIME multipart for zero payload containers
    
    
       Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:14:23 -0700
       From: "Dale Moberg" <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>
    
       The syntax, as I decipher it, requires one body-part but
       zero or more encapsulations (which is what a second or nth
       body part is called). So multiparts with just one part
       are allowed.
    
       That does not settle what do in ebxml, but there is
       nothing "wrong" with a multipart with one body part.
    
    Yes, the MIME standard definitely allows multiparts with one part.
    What I'm saying is that SOAP 1.1 With Attachments doesn't say whether
    you're supposed to (a) use MIME multiparts with one part, or (b) go
    back to the original SOAP format and not use MIME multiparts at all.
    It would be better if it said, one way or the other.  And then ebXML
    MS would just "inherit" this.
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
    manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
    manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>