So what you propose would look something like this?
<eb:DuplicateElimination value="true|false"/>
If so, no objections from me. Just to be clear,
it still carries the same semantics we have been
discussing... Only (needs to be) present when CPA says
"perMessage" otherwise defaults to CPA value, correct?
If present and in conflict with CPA, then results
in Inconsistent error.
Cheers,
Chris
David Fischer wrote:
> To the team,
>
>
>
> Does anyone object to renaming QOS to DuplicateElimination?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> David Fischer
> Drummond Group
> ebXML-MS Editor.
>
>