MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

















ebxml-msg message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Deadline




From: Cliff Collins <collinsc@sybase.com>
To: "Miller, Robert (GXS)" <Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com>,David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>,"Ian. C. Jones (E-mail)" <ian.c.jones@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:21:34 -0800









+1
 
Cliff

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Robert (GXS) 
  [mailto:Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 
  9:02 AM
To: David Fischer; Ian. C. Jones (E-mail)
Cc: 
  ebXML Msg
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Deadline


  
I 
  agree with David's response to comment deadlines and to the specification as 
  voted.
  
 
  
Cheers,
  
            
  Bob
  

    
-----Original Message-----
From: David Fischer 
    [mailto:david@drummondgroup.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 
    9:06 PM
To: Ian. C. Jones (E-mail)
Cc: ebXML 
    Msg
Subject: [ebxml-msg] Deadline


    
Ian,
    
 
    
I 
    seemed to be hearing on the call today that unless we include these late 
    comments, the spec would be somehow flawed and not fit for public 
    release?  I feel a little insulted, as should the 25 members who voted 
    for the spec.  Why are we assuming the spec will be better for these 
    comments?  We have worked hard on this spec and we have slipped 
    deadlines several times to allow sufficient comment period.  We have 
    produced a superior product and we should recognize it as 
    such.
    
 
    
Today, 
    we indicated a comment deadline of Jan 18?  Today was not a 
    voting meeting and there was not a quorum.  On Dec 3 we voted and 
    approved a deadline of Jan 11.  We confirmed that deadline again on Dec 
    17.  On Jan 22 we agreed to vote on clarifications, but we did not 
    change any deadlines and we specifically did not accept "errata on items 
    received or implementation experience".
    
 
    
Our 
    deadline is already in the minutes of previous meetings and we should not 
    consider anything after that date (or we will fail to submit this 
    quarter too).  Our consideration should be to anything submitted before 
    that date.
    
 
    
 
    
 
    
Regards,
    
 
    
David 
    Fischer
    
Drummond 
Group.







References:

RE: [ebxml-msg] Deadline
From: "Miller, Robert (GXS)" <Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]


  









Powered by eList eXpress LLC