Doesn't zero payloads mean SOAP 1.1 rather than SOAP w/ Attachments since there are no attachments? David Fischer Drummond Group. -----Original Message----- From: Dan Weinreb [ mailto:
dlw@exceloncorp.com ] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:46 AM To:
rsalz@zolera.com Cc:
david.burdett@commerceone.com;
chris.ferris@sun.com;
david@drummondgroup.com;
ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: Use of MIME multipart for zero payload containers Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 20:35:04 -0400 From: Rich Salz <
rsalz@zolera.com> It might be desired, but it's certainly NOT a simplification, since compliant software will now have to handle two different formats. Actually, it seems to me that this question really ought to be decided by the SOAP 1.1 With Attachments specification, since the question of whether to use a multipart-with-one-part arises not only for ebXML but anything else using SOAP 1.1 With Attachments . Unfortunately their spec does not seem to deal with the issue, as far as I was able to tell from looking at it. -- Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <
http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl >