None at all.
Doug Bunting wrote:
> Shimamura-san,
>
> Yes, that's what I'm proposing.
>
> Chris,
>
> This was your suggestion, do you mind removing the complexity?
>
> Team,
>
> What do you think we're losing if we remove the ability to use
> SequenceNumber with NotGuaranteed behaviour? Put another way, do we foresee
> sliding-window (per-conversation not per-sender) Reliable Messaging
> implementations that don't turn the messages over to the application in
> order?
>
> thanx all,
> doug
>
>