MHonArc v2.5.2 --> ebxml-msg message [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home] Subject: [ebxml-msg] Re: xmldsig-core-schema.xsd
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-msg] Re: xmldsig-core-schema.xsd
----- Original Message ----- From: leanne@zenaptix.com">Leanne Luger To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:41 AM Subject: [ebxml-dev] ebxml message schema HiWe have noticed that the xmldsig schema imported in the version 2 of themessage schema has a different location from the one used in the cpa/cppschema. This in itself is not a problem, however these schema’s definitionsare different yet both use the same namespace. This plays havoc with ourobject mapping tool’s notion that same namespaces means similar schema defs.>From msg-header-2_0.xsd we get:<import namespace="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd"/>>From above location (snip)<element name="SignatureValue" type="ds:SignatureValueType"/><complexType name="SignatureValueType"> <simpleContent> <extension base="base64Binary"> <attribute name="Id" type="ID" use="optional"/> </extension> </simpleContent></complexType>>From cpp-cpa-v1_0.xsd we get <import namespace="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" schemaLocation="http://ebxml.org/project_teams/transport/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd"/>>From above location (same snip) ?<element name="SignatureValue" type="ds:CryptoBinary" /><simpleType name="CryptoBinary"> <restriction base="binary">? <encoding value="base64" />? </restriction>?</simpleType>Would you please consider giving a different namespace to the later version.Regards Ian & Leanne ian@zenaptix.com leanne@zenaptix.com
Powered by eList eXpress LLC
OASIS Open400 TradeCenter, Suite 5900Woburn, MA 01801USA
Phone+1 781 425 5073
Get Involved
Join an Open Project
Join a Technical Committee
About UsPrivacy