+1
Note also that this should be Issue#89 which is also a duplicate
of Issue #19.
Cheers,
Chris
SHIMAMURA Masayoshi wrote:
> The issue's description on the issue list says:
> Description: [see email] We thought that an issue had been raised
> that challenged the "local part" characterization.
>
> I guess the description points out my comment:
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-msg/200111/msg00313.html>
>
> As I explained in the comment, the word "local part" does not appear in
> the RFC2392. So please remove following sentence from section "3.1.6.1
> MessageId Element".
>
> The "local part" of the identifier as defined in [RFC2392] is
> implementation dependent.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> SHIMAMURA Masayoshi <shima.masa@jp.fujitsu.com>
> TEL:+81-45-476-4590(ext.7128-4241) FAX:+81-45-476-4726(ext.7128-6783)
> Planning Dep., Strategic Planning Div., Software Group, FUJITSU LIMITED
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>