I have not seen any information about the
call. Looks like it will be May 13 when we can take this up
Dale
From: Jacques Durand
[mailto:JDurand@us.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005
11:22 AM
To: 'Matthew MacKenzie'; Dale
Moberg
Cc: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] FW:
[members] OASIS TC Call for Participation: OASIS Web Services Reliable Exchange
(WS-RX) TC
I have
not heard of any call scheduled today.
> It
would be interesting to discuss what would be required in ebms to
>enable pluggability of rm
processors.
Reliability
has been designed from the start as a modular feature in V3 (meaning rather
independent from the processing of ebMS headers), so that should not be too
hard to realize. So far, the definition of QoS reliability features, and the
abstract operations involved are rather similar between the two reliability
specs. I see two things that can be done and an issue to resolve:
- the
core body of V3 specification should only address the common reliability model,
and related abstract operations (which/how they are used to make various MEPs
reliable), but not mention any specific to WS-Reliability. The parts of the RM
agreement that are common (top level QoS features) can also be profiled here.
-
WS-Reliability specifics (e.g. lower level RM agreement parameters) can be
moved to a binding section in appendix. The other module based on
WS-ReliableMessaging would be treated the same when it is ready (could take a
year, maybe two...)
- issues:
reliability of synchronous responses is not addressed by either spec...
although it is on the WS-Reliability roadmap and has been anticipated in
current V3 draft, we don't know about WS-ReliableMessaging. Also,
WS-ReliableMessaging is a bit fuzzy regarding the notification of delivery
failure. It may need to be profiled further so we can have a clear contract at
MSH level.
For now
I'd rather concentrate on the other features beside reliability: still a lot to
do there...
Jacques
-----Original
Message-----
From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 7:03
AM
To: Dale Moberg
Cc: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] FW:
[members] OASIS TC Call for Participation: OASIS Web Services Reliable Exchange
(WS-RX) TC
It would
be interesting to discuss what would be required in ebms to
enable pluggability of rm
processors.
Dale
Moberg wrote:
>If we
are meeting today, could we add the following item to our agenda
>and try to figure out what
convergence involves for the reliability
>functionality in 3.0?
>
>Dale Moberg
>
>
>