MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ebxml-msg message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: AW: [ebxml-msg] Business (Legal) analysis of ebMS 3.0




From: "Sacha Schlegel" <sschlegel@cyclonecommerce.com>
To: "Anders W. Tell" <anderst@toolsmiths.se>,<ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 02:40:19 -0700






Hi Anders
 
It was http://b.ydcorp.com/ebms/trunk/ a while back. It seems to currently not work.
 
Matthew might tell you.
 
Regards
 
Sacha

________________________________

Von: Anders W. Tell [mailto:anderst@toolsmiths.se]
Gesendet: Fr 19.11.2004 01:06
An: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Betreff: [ebxml-msg] Business (Legal) analysis of ebMS 3.0



Hi,

Im doing an analysis of some protocols from a business (and legal)
requirements point of view. ebMS is one of analysed protocols. One area
of concern is Acknowledge of Receipt funcitonality and rules of
evidence. Looking at the older may 3.0 draft it seems as if ebMS
proposes, for some patterns, acknowledgements 5+1+1 times which seems to
be rather many.

Could someone pointme to the latest ebMS spec so I have the latest info
available?

I would also appreciate if a clarification could be given if  ebMS
includes the ebMS Acknowledge (intermadiary and party) found in ebMS 2.0?

thanks
/anders



To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-msg/members/leave_workgroup.php.









Follow-Ups:

Re: AW: [ebxml-msg] Business (Legal) analysis of ebMS 3.0
From: Matthew MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com>
Re: AW: [ebxml-msg] Business (Legal) analysis of ebMS 3.0
From: Matthew MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com>








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]