I thought that we had already agreed on: "if eb:MessageOrder is used, then
eb Reliable Messaging should be used as well."
Since we haven't identified and don't have bindings for any other RM
protocols, the issue is moot.
Regards,
Marty
*************************************************************************************
Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************
David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> on 12/10/2001 10:36:22 PM
To: "Miller, Robert (GXS)" <Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com>, ebxml-msg
<ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc:
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Message Order Inconsistency section 10 pp's 1,2
Yes, I think you are right.� We talked about other RM mechanisms but then
someone pointed out, the other RM mechanism will probably deliver in order
as well so there is no need for eb:MessageOrder.
IMO, if eb:MessageOrder is used, then eb Reliable Messaging should be used
as well.
Thoughts, Comments, Objections?
Regards,
David Fischer
Drummond Group
ebXML-MS Editor.