OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Groups - AS4 profile for ebMSV3 - OO format (AS4-Profile-csd03-20110328-diffs.odt) uploaded

  • 1.  Groups - AS4 profile for ebMSV3 - OO format (AS4-Profile-csd03-20110328-diffs.odt) uploaded

    Posted 03-28-2011 21:51
    For review: Diff update of AS4 (previous: Feb 23)
    - follow-up on Theo comments.
    - normalized PMode name as "P-Mode", when in plain text.
    - 2.1.3.1 and 2.2.3.1: made support "required" for PMode.ID and PMode.agreement (meaning an implementation must be able to use this Pmode value - if present - to fill-in the related message header element.)
    - responses to Theo comments <JD> in comments. -- Mr Jacques Durand The document revision named AS4 profile for ebMSV3 - OO format (AS4-Profile-csd03-20110328-diffs.odt) has been submitted by Mr Jacques Durand to the OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC document repository. This document is revision #2 of AS4-Profile-cd-01.odt. Document Description: Candidate CD #3 for AS4 profile (odt):
    View Document Details: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=41642 Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/41642/AS4-Profile-csd03-20110328-diffs.odt Revision: This document is revision #2 of AS4-Profile-cd-01.odt. The document details page referenced above will show the complete revision history. PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. -OASIS Open Administration


  • 2.  Re: [ebxml-msg] Groups - AS4 profile for ebMSV3 - OO format (AS4-Profile-csd03-20110328-diffs.odt) uploaded

    Posted 03-30-2011 06:03
    Looks good - glad you also fixed 'PMode.ID: support required' ('not' removed). On 28 Mar 2011, at 11:50 PM, jdurand@us.fujitsu.com wrote: > For review: Diff update of AS4 (previous: Feb 23) > - follow-up on Theo comments. > - normalized PMode name as "P-Mode", when in plain text. > - 2.1.3.1 and 2.2.3.1: made support "required" for PMode.ID and > PMode.agreement (meaning an implementation must be able to use this Pmode > value - if present - to fill-in the related message header element.) > - responses to Theo comments <JD> in comments. -- Regards Theo