+1
Arvola Chan wrote:
> David:
>
> I don't agree with the last sentence in the following paragraph within your
> meeting minutes:
>
>
>>PerMessage parameters: Colleen, what parameters have been identified.
>>
> Arvola: >duplicateElimination, AckRequested, AckRequested/signed. Dale:
> perMessage in >CPA means no agreement. Colleen: what about defaults. Dale:
> OK. Ian: add to >document, if there is a conflict then generate error /
> define error - <<next item>>. >Consensus is that perMessage does not
> require item to appear, there may be an >MSH default.
>
> I have been assuming that the AckRequested element must be present in a
> message before the receiver will return an Acknowledgment. The Message
> Service Interface may have a default to allow the application above to omit
> the specification of whether an Acknowledgment is desired. The sending MSH
> must include an AckRequested element in a message if it expects to receipt
> an Acknowledgment for it.
>
> Similarly, the sending MSH must specify an appropriate value for the
> duplicateElimination attribute in the QualityOfServiceInfo element, one that
> does not conflict with the specification within the CPA.
>
> Regards,
> -Arvola
>
>