OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC

 View Only

  • 1.  Groups - ebMS3-part2-V43.odt (ebMS3-part2-V43.odt) uploaded

    Posted 09-28-2009 11:37 
    Reworked chapter 3, taking into account the TC review at last week's
meeting.

A new section 3.9 on error handling that hopefully improves on the previous
drafts.


 -- Mr. Pim van der Eijk

The document revision named ebMS3-part2-V43.odt (ebMS3-part2-V43.odt) has
been submitted by Mr. Pim van der Eijk to the OASIS ebXML Messaging
Services TC document repository.  This document is revision #13 of
ebMS3-part2-V32-JD.odt.

Document Description:


View Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=34430

Download Document:  
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34430/ebMS3-part2-V43.odt

Revision:
This document is revision #13 of ebMS3-part2-V32-JD.odt.  The document
details page referenced above will show the complete revision history.


PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email application
may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy and paste
the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.

-OASIS Open Administration


  • 2.  Error scenarios with bundling

    Posted 10-02-2009 10:47 
     
Hello,

Attached document has in section 2 a description of a set of
scenarios involving errors in processing bundles, and
illustrates chapter 3, in particular sections 3.4 and 3.9. 

Section 1 is not about bundles at all, it is added to show
how bundles extend ebMS core message handling in case of
errors.

Scenario (11) indicates that the description in section 3.4
in draft 43 is incomplete. 
My proposal is to be more precise in the next draft and
state that an EBMS:0030 error situation causes all units in
the bundle to fail.  Comments welcome.

The examples assume that a receiving MSH does not send
eb:Receipts for message units that have errors. 
If they should, these should be added to the examples 11-14.


I'm sending this in as a separate document rather than
incorporate this in a draft 44 so as to not confuse people.
Please review draft 43 before next week's meeting.

Pim


    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message


Related Content