OASIS Emergency Management TC

RE: [emergency] Agenda: 7/29 Call

  • 1.  RE: [emergency] Agenda: 7/29 Call

    Posted 07-29-2003 16:56
    Yes; as with URIs on the Semantic Web, if one sees 
    a message that contradicts one's understanding, one has 
    to ask.  Trust but verify.
    
    The semantic of concern is in the normative or informative 
    relationship to the specification or standard, not to the 
    terms and conditions of availability, such as open source, 
    IPR declarations, or licensing.
    
    Out of curiosity:  who is responsible for indemnifying 
    an OpenGIS reference implementation?  Or an OASIS 
    reference implementation?  I assume, it is the vendor 
    that provides it, yes?
    
    len
    
    
    From: Carl Reed [mailto:creed@opengis.org]
    
    Interesting discussion. It points out an issue of semantic interoperability
    between (among?) the various standards organizations that frequently
    collaborate.
    
    Just to "throw" some more information in the mix :-) The OGC uses the phrase
    "reference implementation" to mean an open and publicly example of how to
    implement one or more OpenGIS specifications in an application and/or
    architecture. This would be along the lines of Len's "sample"
    implementation. We also use the phrase "reference architecture" to mean an
    example architecture for a given application domain, such as a portal, that
    support use of OpenGIS specifications and related standards and
    specifications. In all cases, these reference implementations are freely and
    openly available to public. Further, they must be unencumbered by IPR.
    Typically, in the OGC world, these implementations are also Open Source.
    
    Obviously, we do not view "reference" in the same restrictive manner as some
    organizations.