Time: 10:00 am EDT
Tel: 512-225-3050 Access Code: 65998
Proposed Agenda for 12-Mar-09 TC Meeting:
10:00 - 10:05 Roll Call & Approve Minutes
Voting Members
Bill Parducci Individual
Rich Levinson Oracle Corporation
Hal Lockhart Oracle Corporation
Seth Proctor Sun Microsystems
John Tolbert The Boeing Company
Duane DeCouteau Veterans Health Administration
Members
Dilli Arumugam Sun Microsystems
Dilli Dorai Sun Microsystems (* need to check membership)
Observers
John Moehrke GE Healthcare
5 March 2009 TC Meeting
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00047.html
minutes approved
10:05 - 10:10 Administrivia
Version Control (submit conformance tests)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00026.html
Bill posted changes to list, conformance tests
Static directories - not how versions designed
Conformance Tests
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00027.html
... (+ 7 intermediate emails)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00048.html
subversion has some primitives, but may be more than we need
things are "tagged"
v3 Core, Multiple Resource Profile SAML Profile Updates
(Sample Policy Assertion: policy identifiers action item)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00028.html
Erik posted message explaining 3 categories:
("top level", "ReferencedPolicies",
"Policies outside assertion")
Hal: why do categories need to be kept separate
Action: TC: Hal indicates all should be reviewing specs and
asking questions if there are concerns about any aspect.
10:10 - 11:00 Issues
Hierarchical Resource Profile Proposal
Hier: Hal's summary:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00031.html
... (+ 12 intermediate emails)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00068.html
Hier: New core and multiple resource profile and hierarchical
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00024.html
... (+ 8 intermediate emails)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00065.html
Hier: Hierarchical Profile and the URI
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00050.html
... (+ 7 intermediate emails)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200903/msg00063.html
Hal: there appears to be general agreement that the issue is
whether or not to include ancestors that are "transitive".
(where from prev mtg discussion: "transitive is mathematical
term meaning any ancestor of my ancestor is also my ancestor,
even if the ancestor belongs to hierarchies that I do not
belong to. Presumably the transitive property applies to
those ancestors in that all inclusive set that are not
ancestors through any hierarchy I belong to, but only
through hierarchis that my ancestors belong to that I do not.
Hal: recalls original assumptions that one or more hierarchies
singly multiply rooted.
Bill: agrees
Hal: some consensus that transitive ancestors are not needed.
Hal: if we include only hierarchies, that resource is a
member of, that should solve any problems.
Rich: agrees, but expects based on emails that this is exactly
the point of disagreement that has caused all the discussion.
Hal: we need input from other interested parties on this issue.
Meeting adjourned 10:40