OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

> 

                                                

					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
                                                

                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message
                                                
                                                Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Nevin (bnevin) [mailto:bnevin@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2010 October 12 11:16
> To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Minutes for 12 October 2010
> 
> . . .

> Kavi logs do not automatically promote and demote based on attendance
status. Kris was out on the two days when we had two meetings back to
back, hence disqualified. 


fwiw, the reference in the above should be to JoAnn, not Kris.
(Gershon too, but the discussion was about JoAnn.)

paul

Hi Bruce,



One correction, please. I did not mean to indicate that the Pharma
group was interested in coordinating what they are doing with the
enterprise business documents subcommittee—just that one of the members
of the Pharma group sent out an email today expressing interest in a potential interplay.
I think the following would more closely reflect what I was trying to say:





MB: … [add: One member
of] the Pharma group [add: posted an email to that group today asking how this
relates] [delete: was interested in connecting this] to what they're doing. Can
our SC deal with the structural issues in a general way so that each SC doesn't
have to address them independently? Can we help enterprise architects
understand how e.g. <task> relates to an SOP.



Here is the link to the Pharma post:  http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita-pharma/email/archives/201010/msg00000.html



Thanks,



Michael