Doug and Chris, On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 09:06:23 -0800 Doug Bunting <
dougb62@yahoo.com> wrote: ... > I recommended, in my comments on the schema and the second half, removal of > the messageOrderSemantics attribute and requiring SequenceNumber in > MessageOrder. The current module is more complicated than necessary, I think that the Doug's change proposal about MessageOrder means: - When MessageOrder element appears, message order is guaranteed. If it does not appears, message order is not guaranteed. - The MessageOrder element has always SequenceNumber element inside. Is that correct, Doug? In the current specification (v1.09), SequenceNumber may appear even if MessageOrderSemantics is set to NotGuaranteed so that receiving application can use the SequenceNumber to guarantee message order by itself. I think it was Chris's idea. See:
http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-transport/200103/msg00099.html http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-transport/200103/msg00101.html http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-transport/200103/msg00102.html http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-transport/200103/msg00104.html Doug's change proposal removes the feature. Chris, what do you think? Regards, -- SHIMAMURA Masayoshi <
shima.masa@jp.fujitsu.com> TEL:+81-45-476-4590(ext.7128-4241) FAX:+81-45-476-4726(ext.7128-6783) Planning Dep., Strategic Planning Div., Software Group, FUJITSU LIMITED