MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

















wsia message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [wsrp] [wsia] [wsrp-wsia joint interfaces] agenda for Tuesday		 11June




From: Eilon Reshef <eilon.reshef@webcollage.com>
To: 'Carsten Leue' <CLEUE@de.ibm.com>, Gil Tayar <Gil.Tayar@elseweb.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:27:51 -0400






Title: Message



Carsten,
 
A small concern I have regarding your point below.
 
Meta-data that defined inter-relationships between portlets doesn't seem 
simple, nor does it seem intuitive to me that the fundamental way in which a 
portal interacts with a set of portals depends on meta-data (and I'm talking 
about a sequence of invocations, not about the type of information passed, which 
is what meta-data is good for).
 
I would much rather have the notion of session sharing either (a) 
disappear (b) be in a one-to-one relation with a service (c) be one-to-one with 
a session, but managed by the portlet group (who don't need to publish this 
information) (d) be explicit in the protocol in some other unidentified 
way.
 
Eilon

  

  
[CL]
The idea was that the producer 
  indicates session sharing capabilities
through its 
  metadata (e.g. by defining categories, etc). However this has
not been detailed yet.
The producer itself is a 
  container of services.
[CL] 
  
 







References:

RE: [wsrp] [wsia] [wsrp-wsia joint interfaces] agenda for Tuesday		 11June
From: Carsten Leue <CLEUE@de.ibm.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]


  









Powered by eList eXpress LLC