for the beneift of all the problem with ResponseID is that the first i supposed to be OrderResponseOrderID (identifying the Order we are responding to) and the second is OrderResponseID (identifying the response). it is a problem with our use of object classes and names for these BIEs. Perhaps Bill can regenerate with these new names. Burcham, Bill wrote: I applied Dave Carlson's hyperModel application this morning, to the public review UBL 0.65 schemas posted yesterday to the ubl-comment list. In order to get the tool to accept the model I had to comment out UBL000423 Order. Response. Identifier -- since the XSD element definition for it (named ResponseID ) clashed with that of UBL000422. They both have the same dictionary entry name, and occur side-by-side in the definition of the Order type. Find attached a Zip archive with the tweaked schema, and six UML diagrams (in SVG format). This time, in addition to the fairly simplistic diagrams rooted on LineItem, Party, etc., I've also included a full diagram. That one shows the whole shebang. Mad props to Dave Carlson for delivering such a handy, powerful tool! See my post from August 9 for instructions on getting the SVG plug-in and using it. B ill Burcham Sr. Software Architect, Standards and Applied Technology Sterling Commerce , Inc. 469. 524 . 2164
bill_burcham@stercomm.com -- regards tim mcgrath fremantle western australia 6160 phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142