On 22 July, bill parducci writes: Re: [xacml] Proposed semantics for operations involving INDETERMINATE > > B. urn:oasis:names:tc:XACML:0.15i:operators:or > > > > 1) Order of evaluation: not specified. Operands may be > > evaluated in any order. > > 2) When does evaluation terminate: when any one of the > > following conditions holds: > > a) One evaluated operand returns TRUE > > b) All operands have been evaluated. > > i) And at least one operand returned INDETERMINATE > > ii) And all operands returned FALSE > > 3) What result is returned: > > 2a) TRUE > > 2bi) INDETERMINATE > > 2bii) FALSE > > 2bi seems to contradict 2a. in the case where i have > > <or> > 1=1 (T) > 1=2 (F) > 1=fred (I) > </or> > > i can yield T (2a) or I (2bi). may i suggest that 2b read: > > b) NO evaluated operand returns TRUE > i) And at least one operand returned INDETERMINATE > ii) And all operands returned FALSE Thanks. That was my intent. Anne -- Anne H. Anderson Email:
Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692