OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

  • 1.  Now or Next?

    Posted 11-15-2010 01:19
    Greetings!
    
    The teens are here!
    
    But, on:
    
    http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3373
    
    I have "resolve as proposed" and 
    
    "As agreed by the TC on 2010-11-01 this issue has been moved to
    ODF-Next"
    
    OK, I'm good, but I'm not that good. ;-)
    
    Can we either bounce it or resolve it tomorrow? 
    
    I will enter either resolution while we are on the phone. 
    
    Thanks!
    
    Hope everyone is at the start of a great week!
    
    Patrick
    
    
    
    


  • 2.  RE: [office] Now or Next?

    Posted 11-15-2010 02:40
    I believe that Michael's comment on the end is definitive and there is no need to revisit OFFICE-3373 on the call.
    
    


  • 3.  Re: [office] Now or Next?

    Posted 11-15-2010 08:07
    Dennis, Oliver, Patrick,
    
    in the call on Monday, the 1st, we agreed to move all issues that are 
    open on the 3rd to ODF-Next. So, on the 3rd the issue was unresolved, I 
    moved it to ODF-Next and added the comment.
    
    We also agreed on the 1st that we still will allow issues to get 
    resolved for CD06 until the 8th if there is an uncontroversial 
    resolution. But the issue has been set resolved on the 4th. So, I assume 
    it has simply been overlooked to adjust the "fix for" field.
    
    Michael
    
    
    
    Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
    > I believe that Michael's comment on the end is definitive and there is no need to revisit OFFICE-3373 on the call.
    > 
    > 


  • 4.  Re: [office] Now or Next?

    Posted 11-15-2010 08:16
    Sorry, I should have had a closer look at the issue. The "fixed for" 
    field is already "ODF 1.2 CD06". So, this is simply an issue that has 
    been resolved after November, the 3rd.
    
    Michael
    
    Michael Brauer wrote:
    > Dennis, Oliver, Patrick,
    > 
    > in the call on Monday, the 1st, we agreed to move all issues that are 
    > open on the 3rd to ODF-Next. So, on the 3rd the issue was unresolved, I 
    > moved it to ODF-Next and added the comment.
    > 
    > We also agreed on the 1st that we still will allow issues to get 
    > resolved for CD06 until the 8th if there is an uncontroversial 
    > resolution. But the issue has been set resolved on the 4th. So, I assume 
    > it has simply been overlooked to adjust the "fix for" field.
    > 
    > Michael
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
    >> I believe that Michael's comment on the end is definitive and there is 
    >> no need to revisit OFFICE-3373 on the call.
    >>
    >> 


  • 5.  Re: [office] Now or Next?

    Posted 11-15-2010 10:48
    Michael,
    
    On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 09:14 +0100, Michael Brauer wrote:
    > Sorry, I should have had a closer look at the issue. The "fixed for" 
    > field is already "ODF 1.2 CD06". So, this is simply an issue that has 
    > been resolved after November, the 3rd.
    > 
    
    Maybe I am just being thick this morning but does this mean I apply the
    resolution or not? ;-)
    
    Sorry.
    
    Hope you are at the start of a great week!
    
    Patrick
    
    
    > Michael
    > 
    > Michael Brauer wrote:
    > > Dennis, Oliver, Patrick,
    > > 
    > > in the call on Monday, the 1st, we agreed to move all issues that are 
    > > open on the 3rd to ODF-Next. So, on the 3rd the issue was unresolved, I 
    > > moved it to ODF-Next and added the comment.
    > > 
    > > We also agreed on the 1st that we still will allow issues to get 
    > > resolved for CD06 until the 8th if there is an uncontroversial 
    > > resolution. But the issue has been set resolved on the 4th. So, I assume 
    > > it has simply been overlooked to adjust the "fix for" field.
    > > 
    > > Michael
    > > 
    > > 
    > > 
    > > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
    > >> I believe that Michael's comment on the end is definitive and there is 
    > >> no need to revisit OFFICE-3373 on the call.
    > >>
    > >> 


  • 6.  Re: [office] Now or Next?

    Posted 11-15-2010 10:56
    Patrick,
    
    Patrick Durusau wrote:
    > Michael,
    > 
    > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 09:14 +0100, Michael Brauer wrote:
    >> Sorry, I should have had a closer look at the issue. The "fixed for" 
    >> field is already "ODF 1.2 CD06". So, this is simply an issue that has 
    >> been resolved after November, the 3rd.
    >>
    > 
    > Maybe I am just being thick this morning but does this mean I apply the
    > resolution or not? ;-)
    
    Yes. Please apply the resolution.
    
    (The resolution has been added after November, the 3rd, but we said we 
    would accept shuch resolutions unless objections are raised, and if we 
    can do so without delaying the next CD. I don't see any objections to 
    the resolution in the issue.)
    
    Michael
    
    > 
    > Sorry.
    > 
    > Hope you are at the start of a great week!
    > 
    > Patrick
    > 
    > 
    >> Michael
    >>
    >> Michael Brauer wrote:
    >>> Dennis, Oliver, Patrick,
    >>>
    >>> in the call on Monday, the 1st, we agreed to move all issues that are 
    >>> open on the 3rd to ODF-Next. So, on the 3rd the issue was unresolved, I 
    >>> moved it to ODF-Next and added the comment.
    >>>
    >>> We also agreed on the 1st that we still will allow issues to get 
    >>> resolved for CD06 until the 8th if there is an uncontroversial 
    >>> resolution. But the issue has been set resolved on the 4th. So, I assume 
    >>> it has simply been overlooked to adjust the "fix for" field.
    >>>
    >>> Michael
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
    >>>> I believe that Michael's comment on the end is definitive and there is 
    >>>> no need to revisit OFFICE-3373 on the call.
    >>>>
    >>>> 


  • 7.  Re: [office] Now or Next?

    Posted 11-15-2010 11:06
    Michael,
    
    Done and done.
    
    I saw the updated message from JIRA after I hit send. ;-)
    
    Hope you are having a great day!
    
    Patrick
    
    On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 11:53 +0100, Michael Brauer wrote:
    > Patrick,
    > 
    > Patrick Durusau wrote:
    > > Michael,
    > > 
    > > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 09:14 +0100, Michael Brauer wrote:
    > >> Sorry, I should have had a closer look at the issue. The "fixed for" 
    > >> field is already "ODF 1.2 CD06". So, this is simply an issue that has 
    > >> been resolved after November, the 3rd.
    > >>
    > > 
    > > Maybe I am just being thick this morning but does this mean I apply the
    > > resolution or not? ;-)
    > 
    > Yes. Please apply the resolution.
    > 
    > (The resolution has been added after November, the 3rd, but we said we 
    > would accept shuch resolutions unless objections are raised, and if we 
    > can do so without delaying the next CD. I don't see any objections to 
    > the resolution in the issue.)
    > 
    > Michael
    > 
    > > 
    > > Sorry.
    > > 
    > > Hope you are at the start of a great week!
    > > 
    > > Patrick
    > > 
    > > 
    > >> Michael
    > >>
    > >> Michael Brauer wrote:
    > >>> Dennis, Oliver, Patrick,
    > >>>
    > >>> in the call on Monday, the 1st, we agreed to move all issues that are 
    > >>> open on the 3rd to ODF-Next. So, on the 3rd the issue was unresolved, I 
    > >>> moved it to ODF-Next and added the comment.
    > >>>
    > >>> We also agreed on the 1st that we still will allow issues to get 
    > >>> resolved for CD06 until the 8th if there is an uncontroversial 
    > >>> resolution. But the issue has been set resolved on the 4th. So, I assume 
    > >>> it has simply been overlooked to adjust the "fix for" field.
    > >>>
    > >>> Michael
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>> Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
    > >>>> I believe that Michael's comment on the end is definitive and there is 
    > >>>> no need to revisit OFFICE-3373 on the call.
    > >>>>
    > >>>>