I agree. For conformance tests, we need to use a consistent version#. -Anne On 21 August, Polar Humenn writes: RE: [xacml] Chapter 2 > From: Polar Humenn <
polar@syr.edu> > To: Tim Moses <
tim.moses@entrust.com> > Subject: RE: [xacml] Chapter 2 > Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 12:57:43 -0400 (EDT) > > > I think we should be using the version that we are going to publish, which > is 1.0. Shall we work toward that? > > -Polar > > > On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Tim Moses wrote: > > > Polar - Yes it should. There are a number of such inconsistencies. My > > question: when do we start using "1.0" in our examples, etc.? Should that > > be in our next version, which will still be marked draft v0.16. All the > > best. Tim. > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Tim Moses > > Tel: 613.270.3183 > > > > > >