MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [xacml] Function naming convention




From: Michiharu Kudoh <KUDO@jp.ibm.com>
To: XACML TC <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:21:31 +0900







Since XPath 2.0 uses hyphen for function and operator names, I would prefer
option A.

Best
Michiharu

IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory, Internet Technology
Tel. +81 (46) 215-4642   Fax +81 (46) 273-7428




                                                                                                                                                    
                      Daniel Engovatov                                                                                                              
                      <dengovatov@cross        To:       "'Anne.Anderson@Sun.com'" <Anne.Anderson@Sun.com>, XACML TC <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>   
                      logix.com>               cc:                                                                                                  
                                               Subject:  RE: [xacml] Function naming convention                                                     
                      2002/08/21 06:14                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                    




Which one should we use?

A) blah-blah
B) blah_blah (my preference, dashes are not always supported)
C) blahBlah (camel case is not good in case insensitive)