MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















emergency message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [emergency] EDXL DE - XML Schema Issue




From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
To: <swebb@gefeg.com>, "'Rex Brooks'" <rexb@starbourne.com>,       "'Renato Iannella'" <renato@nicta.com.au>,       "'Emergency_Mgt_TC TC'" <emergency@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:33:03 -0800






I concur.

Regards.
Rex

At 5:09 PM -0800 11/9/05, Sylvia Webb wrote:
>I'm sorry I didn't respond earlier, I've had all day meetings.
>
>It's my understanding that the revisions needed to be completed literally
>this past Monday and no later than this coming Monday.
>
>The documentation was verbose because that is the recommendation for XML
>standards from ISO and UN/CEFACT. UBL uses these guidelines as well. It is
>unusual that the documentation is exactly the same as the spec, however, I
>believe this was a result of a lack of time.
>
>WRT errors from Spy and Oxygen, as a software vendor of XML products, one of
>the things we have learned is that this is not unusual. The schema did
>validate with Xerces and I believe MVS. NIST has a free online website for
>testing schema using 3 validates.  As a TC, we need to determine how much QA
>we want to do, and, how we want to proceed if we find that well known IDE's
>use a different or relaxed interpretation of the W3C spec that causes
>problems.  
>
>If Renato sends me his suggestions, I will do my best to incorporate them. 
>
>I think the TC needs to decide if they want to move forward or delay one
>more month to allow us to do one more QA.
>
>Regards,
>Sylvia
>
>