OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC

  • 1.  Is the way clear to work on MEP in MQTT? Request for interested TC members

    Posted 04-13-2016 16:33
    Shawn -- The rechartering is going out for the formal ballot; the input to ballot is at https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/mqtt/download.php/57920/MQTT%20Recharter.docx   . There will be some cleanup to remove the instructions, keeping the semantics in place. We think that it enables moving forward to discuss the MEP work that we spent some time on. I've volunteered to participate; we're assuming you are, and this message is to the TC list asking for interest. Please take a look at the recharter proposal - I think that it does what was planned. Thanks! bill -- William Cox   Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com   Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com   +1 862 485 3696 mobile


  • 2.  RE: Is the way clear to work on MEP in MQTT? Request for interested TC members

    Posted 04-14-2016 13:58




    Hi Bill,
    While I missed yesterday’s WG call (apologies for that), from the call on Tuesday, in the charter discussion, we reviewed inclusion of the request/reply MEP
    activity that we started earlier and I’m happy with the charter wording to include that.  I will definitely be continue to be actively involved in developing this feature as part of MQTT v.next and look forward to the involvement and ideas of others as well.
     
    As a recap: Where we are on this feature is that there is currently a draft dcommittee note document

    here (of which I am the editor) that contains the description of both the problem statement and currently proposed solution.  The solution describes overall how to provide a request/reply mechanism in MQTT but stops short of specific protocol procedures
    and encodings as we wait for the metadata work to progress (since there is currently no way to add new fields to MQTT3.1.1 as required by the request/reply feature and several other features being added to MQTT).
     
    I will be adding a reference to this doc in the jira so they can be linked.
     
    I look forward to progressing this and the other top work items in the MQTT WG into MQTT v.next.
     
    Cheers,
    Shawn

     


    From: William Cox [mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com]

    Sent: April-13-16 12:33 PM
    To: Shawn McAllister; mqtt@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: Is the way clear to work on MEP in MQTT? Request for interested TC members


     
    Shawn --

    The rechartering is going out for the formal ballot; the input to ballot is at
    https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/mqtt/download.php/57920/MQTT%20Recharter.docx   . There will be some cleanup to remove the instructions, keeping the semantics in place.

    We think that it enables moving forward to discuss the MEP work that we spent some time on.

    I've volunteered to participate; we're assuming you are, and this message is to the TC list asking for interest.

    Please take a look at the recharter proposal - I think that it does what was planned.


    Thanks!

    bill

    --


    William Cox  
    Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com  
    Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com  
    +1 862 485 3696 mobile
     







  • 3.  RE: Is the way clear to work on MEP in MQTT? Request for interested TC members

    Posted 04-14-2016 14:02




    Apologies  – incorrect link to the request/reply document – the correct one is

    https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/mqtt/document.php?document_id=56842

     

     


    From: mqtt@lists.oasis-open.org
    [mailto:mqtt@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Shawn McAllister
    Sent: April-14-16 9:58 AM
    To: William Cox; mqtt@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: [mqtt] RE: Is the way clear to work on MEP in MQTT? Request for interested TC members


     
    Hi Bill,
    While I missed yesterday’s WG call (apologies for that), from the call on Tuesday, in the charter discussion, we reviewed inclusion of the request/reply MEP
    activity that we started earlier and I’m happy with the charter wording to include that.  I will definitely be continue to be actively involved in developing this feature as part of MQTT v.next and look forward to the involvement and ideas of others as well.
     
    As a recap: Where we are on this feature is that there is currently a draft dcommittee note document

    here (of which I am the editor) that contains the description of both the problem statement and currently proposed solution.  The solution describes overall how to provide a request/reply mechanism in MQTT but stops short of specific protocol procedures
    and encodings as we wait for the metadata work to progress (since there is currently no way to add new fields to MQTT3.1.1 as required by the request/reply feature and several other features being added to MQTT).
     
    I will be adding a reference to this doc in the jira so they can be linked.
     
    I look forward to progressing this and the other top work items in the MQTT WG into MQTT v.next.
     
    Cheers,
    Shawn

     


    From: William Cox [ mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com ]

    Sent: April-13-16 12:33 PM
    To: Shawn McAllister; mqtt@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: Is the way clear to work on MEP in MQTT? Request for interested TC members


     
    Shawn --

    The rechartering is going out for the formal ballot; the input to ballot is at
    https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/mqtt/download.php/57920/MQTT%20Recharter.docx   . There will be some cleanup to remove the instructions, keeping the semantics in place.

    We think that it enables moving forward to discuss the MEP work that we spent some time on.

    I've volunteered to participate; we're assuming you are, and this message is to the TC list asking for interest.

    Please take a look at the recharter proposal - I think that it does what was planned.


    Thanks!

    bill

    --
    William Cox  
    Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com  
    Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com  
    +1 862 485 3696 mobile
     







Related Content