OASIS Charter Submission Discuss

Hi Mary,
I also was surprised a little with the separation right 
away. I thought it might be a core SCA TC in the beginning continued with 
sub-TC for 'platform' porting later on.
 
Cheers,
- Michael Poulin



  

  

  From: David RR Webber (XML) 
  [mailto:david@drrw.info]
Sent: 02 July 2007 15:46
To: 
  mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
Cc: 
  oasis-charter-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: 
  [oasis-charter-discuss] All these OASIS Service Component Architecture for 
  XXXX language...


  

  
Mary,
  
 
  
Is it just me - but I thought the whole point of SCA was that there is a 
  common consistent approach - that is language agnostic - and that you should 
  not need a TC for every language out there implementing SCA...
  
 
  
Rather - from the base SCA work - you should be able to develop simple 
  Appendices - for BPEL, Java, C++, VB, Delphi, Ruby, SQL et al as non-normative 
  guides.
  
 
  
Am I missing something here?  Or is this really just a case of 
  everyone deciding they have to own their own little patch of the turf?!?
  
 
  
DW

"The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)