Dear TC members,
I had a look at the needs-discussion issues today. There were several
which have been resolved after the needs-discussion flag has been set.
My assumption is that in this case it has only been overlooked to remove
the needs-discussion, and have removed it now.
However, there are several needs-discussion issues left. For some it is
clear that a discussion is needed, but there are also several where this
is not clear. I therefore would like to ask you to review these issue,
and if you have set an issue on needs-discussion, to check whether there
are still items to be discussed. Please indicate that by stating in the
issue what exactly is open.
If there are further issues that in your opinion need to be discussed,
please set them on needs-discussion, so that we can use this flag as
basis for going through the issues in the TC call on Monday.
When setting an issue to needs-discussion or keeping it on discussion, I
would like to ask you to differ between the cases where you object to a
resolution because it is incorrect, and where you object to a resolution
because you think there may be a better one. In the later case it may be
reasonable to open a new issue, since this would allow us to at least
integrate the resolution we have so far. It would be bad to loose a good
resolution only because there may be a better one.
Best regards
Michael
--
Michael Brauer | Oracle Office Development
Phone: +49 40 23646 500
Oracle Office GBU
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Rijnzathe 6, 3454PV De Meern, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven